Friday, January 30, 2015

On the "integrity of the game"




For the past few years, I’ve been looking forward to the annual occurrence of the Super Bowl, but not for the usual reasons - which team is the superior one, how will the quarterbacks perform against each other, how wide will the point spread be?  Rather, I now await the Super Bowl to see what fresh scandal will hit the NFL and to what degree will it manage the aftermath with more or less competence than the prior year? Last year, at this point, you may remember, Seahawks Cornerback Richard Sherman was in the news because of a tantrum he pitched in front of the cameras at the conclusion of their successful contest against the 49ers. Back then, I commented on the disproportionate and negative reaction of the news media to an incident that lasted exactly 34 seconds and which led to an Internet feeding frenzy (see my Blog entry at: http://lasallehs.blogspot.com/2014/02/why-we-need-black-history-month.html). Now, we have the question of who deflated eleven of the twelve footballs supplied by the Patriots for their 45-7 victory over the Colts in the AFC Championship game. The NFL, always quick to overreact and slow to anticipate the inevitable consequences of its own myopia (see Matthew Kory on Forbes’ Blog: Deflate-gate Is The Dumbest Sports Controversy Ever in which he reminds football fans that, ironically, it was the Patriots’ Tom Brady and the Colts’ Peyton Manning who encouraged the NFL to modify its requirement that the league maintain possession of all footballs used during the season), launched an investigation.

 Really? This, from an NFL that can’t police the behavior of its bad-boy players and their often corrupt owners?  To wit:

Ø     2007  - Patriots Spygate incident

Ø     2007 -  Falcons Quarterback Michael Vick's dog fighting ring

Ø     2009 -  New Orleans Saints bounty scheme

Ø     2013 - Patriots Tight end Aaron Hernandez murder case

Ø     2013 - Dolphins Offensive linemen Ritchie Incognito bullying teammate  Jonathan Martin

Ø     2014 - Ravens Running back Ray Rice dragging his, then, fiancée, from an elevator

Ø     2014 - Vikings running back Adrian Peterson whipping his child

 

I have to ask: what is the significance of a deflated football in a game - which concluded with a lopsided score - when viewed against the context of horrendous player (and team) behavior on and off the field? Where are the NFL’s priorities?

 Please don’t get me wrong; as an educator, I abhor cheating of any kind. Yet, I wonder how the NFL can assume such a high-profile presence regarding a minor violation of its game-day rules and continue to fail to establish and enforce policies governing player-behavior on and off the field - especially when it leads to an arrest?  NFL Vice-President Troy Vincent said the league is serious about the deflated football allegations because the integrity of the game is at stake.


Really? Then, is the integrity of the game not at stake when bad boy players beat up their future wives, or abuse dogs, or murder another football player? Where are the league’s priorities? If we accept the notion that, because of their popularity, major league athletes - like it or not - present themselves as role models to young people, then shouldn’t the NFL - which happily accepts the revenue generated by fans - young and old - pay at least as much attention­ - to the performance of its players off the field as it does on? What happens to athletes between the halcyon days of JV football and the world Michael Vick occupies?  

I don’t have answers to these questions; but I do know they form the context within which the La Salle family seeks to inculcate in the students entrusted to our care a righteous understanding of what it means to protect the “integrity of the game,” and I’m pretty sure it doesn’t look like what the NFL sees as its responsibility.

 
I guess I’ll just have to wait until next year…

 

 

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

What should college be about?



As I write this, our seniors are immersed in the college application process and their teachers are being inundated with requests for recommendations. Conversations about whether a particular college is a “Common Application” school and “Do you want me to submit the recommendation through Naviance?” opens up the brave new world of technology as it applies to the college admissions process. The bulk of their recommendations will be written by their teachers and college counselors; but every year, two or three seniors will, for a variety of reasons, want a recommendation from the School’s President. I don’t mind; it keeps me involved in their lives as students and aware of how their high school career has prepared them for college and beyond.  Plus, having taught English in a previous life - two or three recommendations a year is a light load!
The college application process is probably the most intellectually and emotionally draining experience of the four years teenagers will spend in high school. It is so stressful that, just shy of ten years ago, La Salle launched “Camp College,” a week-long program during the summer between junior and senior year in which students devote their time to the identification of colleges that represent a good “fit” for them (along with, what our College Counselors call, “safety” and “stretch” schools) and drafting the all-important college essay. Needless to say, Camp College fills up fast.
With nearly a third of our students earning a 4.0 GPA each semester of attendance (with similarly impressive performances at the 3.5 and 3.0 marks), I know our graduates will enroll in selective and competitive colleges and universities.  The performance of the Class of 2014 illustrates my point: 30 students matriculated at a UC campus (six students headed off to UCLA) with another 24 attending CSU. Private colleges and universities enrolling members of the Class of 2014 included: Brown, Carnegie Mellon, NYU, University of Chicago and Notre Dame. The University of Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, VPI, Oregon, Indiana (Bloomington) and LSU represented some of the competitive out-of-state public institutions who received members of the Class of 2014. I’m not surprised by these results; over 60% of the Class of 2014 earned Honors at Commencement - the highest it’s been in five years.
We are particularly proud of Renaissance Forster ‘14 and Elizabeth Lynch ’14 who achieved the rare accomplishment of being admitted to West Point - from the same school (less than 30% of military academy nominations will be admitted). I can’t resist the temptation to make the point that Renaissance and Elizabeth highlight my firm conviction that La Salle, a coeducational school, can nurture leadership skills in young women as successfully as our single-gender counterparts assert.
Still, these impressive results beg the central question about higher education in the 21st Century: to what end? Is a college or university education meant to be the capstone of 16 years of formal education, rounding out a student’s knowledge and honing in on a particular area of study called a “major?” Or is its purpose to ground a student in the rigors of a professional discipline that will provide access to employment after graduation?
Like many educators, I would argue for both outcomes. Higher education has always concerned itself with the education of both the mind and the person.  It is a false dichotomy to argue that one should take precedence over the other. I favor the perspective of Harvard Professor and cultural critic, Louis Menand (he hails from my home town in upstate New York), who captured the problem of confusing higher education with employability when he recently asserted:

“Education is about personal and intellectual growth, not about winning some race to the top.”

And yet, college students today are “voting with their feet;” they are choosing majors and concentrations that align themselves with the utilitarian end of higher education. The Pew Survey (2013) of higher education reports that 60% of college students are not liberal arts majors; the #1 major is business and more than twice as many degrees are awarded in parks, recreation, leisure and fitness than in philosophy and religion. This isn’t to suggest that these trends are misguided, just that they are incomplete with respect to what college preparatory schools like La Salle aspire for their graduates.
            The quality of college placements earned by the Class of 2014 suggests that our students leave La Salle knowing that both the mind and the person must be stretched over the course of the next four years. I believe their four years at La Salle have prepared them for what the Pew survey also reports - which is that the vast majority of graduates from a four-year institution say their college education helped them grow intellectually and to mature as a person. In other words, college may teach students as much about getting along with people as it does about analyzing Shakespeare’s sonnets (or mastering a spreadsheet).
            Our recent Annual Report highlights our successful Advanced Placement program - a critical element in providing our most talented students with a college-level academic program which nurtures their ability to interpret, synthesize, and use evidence found within a wide range of sources. This is the essence of a college-preparatory education and our AP and Honors curriculum is available to any student willing to challenge his/her ability to stretch their minds under the tutelage of extraordinarily talented educators.
            This is why I look forward to the opportunity to write letters of recommendation for those seniors who request it. I know that their academic preparation, active involvement in and out of the classroom, on and off the field has enabled them to approach the college application process with confidence that they will successfully meet the challenges they will face in the next chapter of their academic career.

Thursday, January 1, 2015

On the road again...





“If you don't know where you're going, any road'll take you there”

Beatles aficionados will recognize this as the refrain to Any Road, the Grammy nominated opening song on George Harrison’s posthumously published album Brainwashed. Harrison performed it in public only once - in 1997 - just a few years before he died of cancer at the age of 58. Harrison frequently used the line to describe his good fortune that he always knew he wanted to play the guitar professionally. What Beatles connoisseurs may not realize is that the line was drawn from a rather famous interaction between Alice and the Cheshire Cat in Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland:

"Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?"

"That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat.

"I don’t much care where--" said Alice.

"Then it doesn’t matter which way you go," said the Cat.

"--so long as I get SOMEWHERE," Alice added as an explanation.

"Oh, you’re sure to do that," said the Cat, "if you only walk long enough."

I was reminded of this delightful interaction as I reviewed the results from the parent survey that was recently distributed electronically as part of our WASC/WCEA/Strategic Planning process. Not surprisingly, we received robust feedback regarding what works and what needs improvement at La Salle (for more on this, please plan on attending Back to School Night on Thursday, January 8th). It was clear to me that our parents - indeed all of the School’s constituents - want to know what road La Salle is taking as we embrace a future not ours to control. And, cerrtainly, unlike Alice, we don’t want to get “somewhere” just for the sake of the getting.

We know that the essence of strategic planning resides in an institutional determination to choose a path forward which will advance the Mission while, at the same time, preparing for a future of twists and turns that will - inevitably - attempt to derail progress. We saw this dynamic play itself out during the implementation of our 2001 Strategic Plan.[1]   One of the goals, for example,
Aggressively pursue creative opportunities to resolve existing facilities limitations and which will maximize the delivery of the curricular and co-curricular program.
took over fifteen years to implement (finding a suitable off-site location for Baseball so that the existing space can be used to support the construction of new buildings as part of the School’s Master Plan). In many ways, La Salle faces a much more uncertain future now than it did fifteen years ago. Back then the economy operated at full steam, there were three applicants for every available seat and the School was expanding programs and renovating facilities to meet the needs of the students entrusted to our care. Now, the lingering effects of the Great Recession and the bust of the baby boomlet (there are 50% less students in surrounding public school kindergartens today than a decade ago) challenge the School to continue its focus on program and facility improvement while coping with a decline in earned income.  Happily, charitable giving from all of  La Salle’s constituents has enabled us to continue to renovate facilities and to support program enhancements that meet the needs of our students.  That having been said, it would be like “whistling in the dark” if the School assumed that all would be well if we just stayed the course…which is why strategic planning is so important to La Salle’s future well-being.

As a result, we have spent the last semester gathering data regarding the School’s strengths and challenges with a view towards examining their implications at a Strategic Planning Workshop on February 27/28. The time will be spent seeking answers to these critical questions:

  • What are the central elements of La Salle’s Mission which must be preserved and enhanced over the course of the next decade?
  • What strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges confront the School, going forward?
  • What should the School do more of, less of, to respond to a future not ours to control?
  • What resources are available to the School to meet the challenges of an uncertain future and how can they be effectively leveraged?
Given that La Salle has not only survived but thrived over the course of the last five decades, I am confident that we will be able to successfully chart the course of the first decade of the next fifty years.  
 
So, in response to the challenge of George/Alice, I would like to quote a German proverb:
What's the use of running if you are not on the right road?
I am absolutely confident that La Salle’s strategic planning exercise will (like it’s 2001 predecessor) make sure we are running on the right road.